Wachsende Geldvermögensbestände machen das Veranlagungsverhalten der privaten Haushalte zu einem immer wichtigeren Bestimmungsgrund
des Finanzmarktgeschehens. Das Geldvermögen österreichischer Haushalte ist im internationalen Vergleich noch niedrig – sie
verfügten Ende 1993 aber bereits über einen geschätzten Bestand von nicht ganz 2.100 Mrd. S. Im Haushaltsdurchschnitt entspricht
das einem Betrag von rund 660.000 S. Gleichzeitig zeigt eine – erstmals für Österreich durchgeführte – Detailuntersuchung
des privaten Anlegerverhaltens, daß die Nutzung höherwertiger Anlageformen auf eine kleine Gruppe von Haushalten konzentriert
ist. Erbschaften erweisen sich als ein wesentlicher Anstoß für Veränderungen der Veranlagungsstruktur, als Einstieg in höherwertige
Anlageformen. So nutzen Haushalte mit Erbschaften die Veranlagung in Wertpapieren signifikant stärker als Haushalte ohne Erbschaften.
Keywords:Das Geldvermögen privater Haushalte in Österreich; Financial Assets of Private Households in Austria
Forschungsbereich:Makroökonomie und öffentliche Finanzen
Sprache:Deutsch
The stock of financial assets owned by private households at the end of 1993 was estimated at almost Sch 2,100 billion. For
the individual household this amounts to financial assets worth about Sch 660,000 on average, while indebtedness was slightly
higher than Sch 260,000. These amounts may seem high but the financial wealth of Austrian households is low in an international
comparison. While in the U.S., Japan, and the United Kingdom financial assets are more than twice as high as nominal gross
domestic product, financial wealth amounted to only 98.7 percent of GDP in Austria; this ratio puts Austria in ninth place
among 11 OECD countries. In a ranking of per-capita GDP at purchasing power parities, Austria is, however, ranked as high
as fourth. Even the household sector in Germany, despite the accession of the new Länder, has a markedly higher ratio of financial
wealth to GDP. On a per-capita basis, financial wealth was the highest in Japan and the U.S., exceeding Sch 700,000. With
Sch 331,000 Germany is ranked ahead of Austria (Sch 264,000). On the other hand, indebtedness of households is very low in
Austria. In relation to gross domestic product, it is lower only in Italy. For the first time in Austria it was possible to
go beyond the global data and to investigate the portfolio behavior of private investors on the basis of a survey of more
than 1,000 households in Vienna. The main results of this study are that only a relatively small group of households take
advantage of more sophisticated investment forms. Another major result was that the financial position of households varies
markedly over the life cycle. With a share of 85.9 percent, by far the largest group within the household sector can be classified
as traditional-conservative investors. 8.7 percent of all households hold only a minimal portfolio. Only 5.4 percent of households
can be characterized as holding a more differentiated portfolio, i.e., taking advantage of a greater variety of investment
instruments. The main feature of this small group of households is that 84.2 percent own securities. About 29 percent of these
households hold shares in their portfolio. If household types are formed according to the life cycle, only households with
two married family members under 39 years of age are in a position of net indebtedness. For this type of household, establishing
a family, investing in housing, and having a low income and wealth level occur in the same phase, resulting in an excess of
liabilities over assets. Two-person households whose primary income earner is more than 50 years old have the highest net
financial wealth. Long-term wealth accumulation as well as the repayment of debts account for the favorable position of this
type of household. The study reveals finally that households that have received bequests have a higher stock of financial
assets. A significantly higher percentage of this group (23 percent versus 11 percent) owns securities. The rising number
and volume of bequests thus turns out to be a crucial factor in fostering change in portfolio behavior.